Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR6702 15_Redacted
Original file (NR6702 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TLG
Docket No: 6702-15
21 August 2015

 

This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 20 July 2015. yYou previously petitioned the Board and
were advised in our letter that your applications had been

disapproved.

Because your application was submitted with new evidence not
previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of
justice to review your application. Your current request has
been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on

14 August 2015. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application and any material
submitted in support of your application.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the documentation that you
provided, even though not previously considered by the Board,
was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. A review of your recent application and its
attachments reveal that again your request must be denied.
Regarding your assertion of suffering from post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD), the Board noted that you did not provide a
diagnosis and the severity of your misconduct, specifically
testing positive for Marijuana, outweighs any mitigation offered
by the alleged PTSD condition. It is regrettable that the
circumstances of your case are such that the Board will not
process any additional reviews and this matter is considered a
final action. However, if you wish to continue to seek relief
you will need to present your concerns to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction.

Further, regarding your request for a personal appearance, be
advised that Board regulations state that personal appearances
before the Board are not granted as a right, but only when the
Board determines that such an appearance will serve some useful
purpose. In your case, the Board determined that a personal
appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on

the evidence of record.

 

OBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7771 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR7771 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7562 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR7562 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10560 14

    Original file (NR10560 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12825 14

    Original file (NR12825 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) asa reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR510 14

    Original file (NR510 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11609 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR11609 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 26 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1105 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR1105 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1105 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR1105 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record.